Advocacy Is Leadership

Executive Director Danielle Brazell blogs about how identifying problems isn't enough—leaders must collaborate to create solutions as well.
What do Arts for LA, Arts for All, the Blue Ribbon Committee for the Arts in LAUSD, the Otis Report on the Creative Economy, Emerging Arts Leaders/Los Angeles, ExperienceLA, The City of LA’s TOT Ordinance and the Arts Census have in common?
Each of these major initiatives was started by an individual asking a critical question. The question led to a conversation. Others were invited to join the dialogue and together they developed a call to action to address a critical gap in our local arts ecology. In time, this call to action grew into a major initiative.
The leaders involved didn’t have “start a major initiative” as a bullet point in their job description. The issue didn’t have a funding opportunity tied to it and each of these initiatives didn’t happen over night. In fact in some cases it took over a decade for the idea to germinate and begin to grow. No—these leaders saw a problem and did something about it.
Over seventeen years ago, a group of executive arts leaders got together to address a proposal by then-Mayor Richard Riordan to consolidate the Department of Cultural Affairs into the Department of Recreation of Parks.
This group did not have a stake in the game. The organizations these leaders represented received nominal grants from the City, not enough to hurt their individual programming. But they realized that eliminating the Department of Cultural Affairs would hurt the arts and cultural delivery system and adversely affect communities who had little or no access to arts and cultural experiences—including some of our city’s most vulnerable communities.

This group took an unprecedented step into the political arena. Not only did they collectively take a position to oppose the proposal, they developed a strategy to lobby members of city council and, through their efforts, killed the proposal.
Over the next decade, the group called themselves the “Ad Hoc Committee of Executive Arts Leaders” and met on a semi-regular basis to address critical issues facing our field. Through these conversations, questions were raised about the next generation of arts leaders, how to create a joint marketing program, what was happening with arts education in the 81 school districts, what was the economic data to support the argument that art and creativity drive our region’s economy. Leadership emerged for each of these critical questions. We now have a stronger arts ecology because of it.
Several founding members of the “Ad Hoc Committee of Executive Arts Leaders” became the steering committee that formed Arts for LA. Many of the initiatives mentioned are still involved with Arts for LA as board members, strategic partners and organizational members.
As arts and civic leaders, we know all too well it’s not enough to identify the problem; we must collaborate and create solutions together. In these challenging times for cities and school districts throughout our region, it’s vital we put our creative thinking skills to these critical issues and mobilize our communities to effect positive change.
Illustration credit: opensource.com





people who love and value art as "end users"
Just read A4LA's new strategic plan for 2013-17. Wondering where in the planning process people who love and value art and the esperience of art turned into "end users." It's a term peculiar to the realm of computer technology and blessedly alien, at least most of the time, to the arts world. Did the TCC Group, those highly LA-sensitive (ha!) out-of-town consultants retained by A4LA, introduce such off-putting terminology and convince A4LA to use it? Did it emerge from the work groups? From staff members? A representative of a member A4LA group? Wherever it came from, I'd urge you to re-think using it in a public document like a strategic plan and suggest you reflect on why you allowed the drafters of the strategic plan to introduce such a term in the first place. I'd also urge you to describe who you really mean when you say "end users" and work to describe them accurately. The result might influence your future success, who knows.
Dear Anonymous, Thanks so
Dear Anonymous,
Thanks so much for taking the time to read through Arts for LA’s strategic plan and for sharing your feedback with us.
In all honesty, the staff and board struggled to articulate the right “term” for our advocates. “Citizens” left too many residents out. “General public” was broad and meaningless. “Arts patrons” was too narrow.
I think your comment really gets to the heart of what Arts for LA is all about. What we’re really talking about when we talk about “end users” are the people who utilize Arts for LA’s tools—our action alert system, our workshop series, our convenings and events, our candidate surveys. We aren’t talking solely about artists, arts enthusiasts, arts patrons, or art lovers alone—we’re also talking about business leaders, elected officials, school board members, philanthropists, and, yes, people who believe the arts are essential to a thriving and healthy community.
Arts for LA has a big tent. Many residents of Los Angeles County are among our supporters and it’s difficult to categorize them effectively. But this is the strength of our movement: we include among our voices so many unique individuals. Arts, culture, and arts education truly offer a bridge between the geographic, cultural, and socioeconomic communities of our region. The arts bring us together.
If you have further feedback about our strategic plan, or ideas or suggestions for how we can be successful implementing it, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Or better yet, create a username and password on ArtsforLA.org so that we can continue our discussion more transparently.
Arts For all?
Seriously I doubt that you have the real picture of how few students have an arts education in LAUSD...have you actually been to the schools? Elementary schools have to share teachers and students do not have the opportunities to have art as part of their educatiion every day. Middle shools have very little Art at all thanks to the LAUSD mindset of test after test after test. I was an art teacher for 35 years and last year the art program at HMS middle school was banished because of poor leadership and PLAS. For the first time in its history there will be no visual art, theater etc...NO Thank you ...too many adults, too many organizations ,too much politics...meanwhile children lose ...
Dear Anonymous
I agree that children are suffering. Access to arts education has been reduced dramatically over the past three years, despite over a decade of dedicated resources to restore it for every child in LAUSD. There are no easy answers to fix this issue. While the economic crisis is but one factor, we need to identify partners and solutions to bring arts education back into the forefront of Board and District leadership. We will continue to advocate for arts education for every-child, regardless of their socioeconomic status. Thank you for your continued advocacy on this issue.